What is the difference between javascript and actionscript

Unfortunately this also adds to build time quite significantly, in Java Script apps of any size I'm used to instant feedback whereas my last ActionScript project had build time exceeding 2 minutes.

The key differences are that ActionScript 3 supports both class-based inheritance and prototypal inheritance, enforces namespace bindings between class names and file names, and does not support some global JavaScript methods such as eval. Fortunately, you can do several things to bridge the gap. If you are using the AS3 namespace, any method override must use the AS3 namespace and the override attribute. If you are not using the AS3 namespace, you can use the prototype methods and propertyIsEnumerable.

If you do not use the AS3 namespace, an instance of a core class inherits the properties and methods defined on the prototype object. If you decide to use the AS3 namespace, an instance of a core class inherits the properties and methods defined in the class definition. JavaScript 2 Draft. The New Browser War. ECMAScript 1-on David Flanagan on JavaScript 2. JavaScript 2 and the Future of the Web. Writing Classes. Faster byte array operations with ASC2. Managing event listeners. What are the key differences between JavaScript and ActionScript 3?

Asked By: Todd Moses. Flutter Web is almost ready for production and I have made 2 complex working websites already. From a management and hiring perspective, I recommend Flutter Dart. It provides native solutions to both mobile platform Android and IOS while having the same knowledge. Hiring managers look at this as an advantage since a developer can provide solutions for both platforms whit the same knowledge.

The Flutter framework is growing and there is a lot of resources to ground your knowledge and start experimenting.

Dart is also a great language that covers most E2E necessities, so again, no further need of learning one language for FE and another for BE and services. It is my belief that Dart will surpass Kotlin soon, and will leverage to Python and Java in the upcoming year.

Flutter is just a Framework just like Django btw. Django is kind of solving a different problem than Dart. So if you want to program Flutter Apps although i wouldn't recommend it for any serious web development yet since Flutter web isn't very mature yet i would recommend you just lern Dart.

If you are interested in Flutter, learn it on your own time, parallel to the course. No matter what order you do them, eventually you will end up learning them all anyway ;-. Most of our developers are only experienced in java. These three languages Go, Node.

I've worked with all three of these languages and also with Java developers converting to these languages and far and away Go is the easier one to convert to. With the improved cold-start times and the ease of conversion for a Java developer, it is a no-brainer for me. The hardest part of the conversion though is going to be the lack of traditional Classes so you have to be mindful of that, but Go Structs and interfaces tend to make up for what is lost there.

AWS libraries felt better integrated on the Go side, I believe due to the language itself e. Besides that performance of Go is much superior.

But on the cons side; community is far smaller around Go, compared to Javascript. That is easy notice if you look at repos of community-maintained libraries for Go. That can feel a bit unreliable. No need to set up a full environment or package dependencies on your lambda AMIs, just copy a file.

If you want to prioritise language familiarity, JavaScript is more like Java than the other choices; and it can be optimised to run very fast.

However if you need really fast cold-start times, you can't beat Go since it's compiled. Go is newer but seems to be quite popular if you need something that runs fast in a single binary. I was initially going to suggest JavaScript due to the smaller size needs of AWS Lambdas code and the larger range of libraries and community available and to avoid Python for this. But I have to agree with the recommendations and rationale of ayildirim above and I think you should choose any reasonable language that is low-overhead, fast startup, and best supported by AWS Lambda, and that is probably Go.

I don't think you are likely to go wrong with that, while you can potentially with the others. So I'd agree, on the strength of AWS Lambda support and the solid performance of Go, it seems like your best choice here for Lambdas and I'm going to need to consider that myself going forward JavaScript is at the forefront of our entire development approach.

Not only do we use different JavaScript frameworks and management tools, but we also use pure vanilla JavaScript to solve simple problems throughout all of our client's builds. JavaScript is a general purpose programming language that can be blazing fast and fun to work with. There's not one project we are working on that doesn't involve it.

Telegram Messenger has frameworks for most known languages, which makes easier for anyone to integrate with them. I started with Golang and soon found that those frameworks are not up to date, not to mention my experience testing on Golang is also mixed due to how their testing tool works.

The natural runner-up was JS, which I'm ditching in favor of TS to make a strongly typed code, proper tests and documentation for broader usage. TypeScript allows fast prototyping and can prevent problems during code phase, given that your IDE of choice has support for a language server, and build phase. Pairing it with lint tools also allows honing code before it even hits the repositories. Our team has always been driven by the right tool for the job rather than what we know best.

That said, in balancing practicality we chose to focus on 3 options that our team had deep experience with and knew the pros and cons of. For us it came down to C , JavaScript, and Ruby. At the time we owned our infrastructure, racks in cages, that were all loaded with Windows.

We were also at a point that we were using that infrastructure to it's fullest and could not afford additional servers running Linux.

That's a long way of saying we decided against Ruby as it doesn't play nice on Windows. That left us with two options. We went a very unconventional route for deciding between the two.

The interfaces were identical and interchangeable. What we found was easily quantifiable differences. For us this was owed to the community coupled with the extremely dynamic nature of JS. There were tradeoffs we considered, latency was acceptably higher on requests to our Node APIs. No strong types to protect us from ourselves, but we've rarely found that to be an issue. As such we decided to commit resources to our Node APIs and push it out as the core brain of our new system.

We haven't looked back since. The key differences are that ActionScript 3 supports both class-based inheritance and prototypal inheritance, enforces namespace bindings between class names and file names, and does not support some global JavaScript methods such as eval. Fortunately, you can do several things to bridge the gap. If you are using the AS3 namespace, any method override must use the AS3 namespace and the override attribute. If you are not using the AS3 namespace, you can use the prototype methods and propertyIsEnumerable.

If you do not use the AS3 namespace, an instance of a core class inherits the properties and methods defined on the prototype object. If you decide to use the AS3 namespace, an instance of a core class inherits the properties and methods defined in the class definition.

JavaScript 2 Draft. The New Browser War. ECMAScript 1-on David Flanagan on JavaScript 2. JavaScript 2 and the Future of the Web. Writing Classes. Faster byte array operations with ASC2. Managing event listeners. Stack Overflow for Teams — Collaborate and share knowledge with a private group. Create a free Team What is Teams?

Collectives on Stack Overflow. Learn more. What are the key differences between JavaScript and ActionScript 3? Ask Question. Asked 11 years, 9 months ago. Active 4 years, 2 months ago. Viewed 37k times. Improve this question. Paul Sweatte Todd Moses Todd Moses Not really the same standard.

Javascript 2. Add a comment. Active Oldest Votes. Improve this answer. Joa Ebert Joa Ebert 6, 7 7 gold badges 31 31 silver badges 46 46 bronze badges.